The Environmental Journal of Southern Appalachia
Wednesday, 22 September 2021 14:29

Pellissippi Parkway punches: Vocal opposition slams highway extension plans at public meeting

Written by

1624321366689

UPDATED: Opponents of Pellissippi Parkway Extension hammer bureaucrats, unelected economic development officials at public meeting

(This story has been updated with this link to the Tennessee Department of Transportation recording of the Sept. 21 public hearing on the proposed Pellissippi Parkway Extension project).

Raw emotions spilled over at a Tennessee Department of Transportation public meeting to collect citizen input on a nearly 5-mile, four-lane highway that would carve through creeks, forests, farms and homes in rural Blount County in the foothills of the Great Smoky Mountains.

The meeting was held Tuesday evening at Heritage High School, not far from where the proposed Pellissippi Parkway Extension (which would originate at the terminus of the current parkway near Rockford) would abruptly bisect East Lamar Alexander Parkway, just to the west of Walland Gap and the Little River Gorge.

As Hellbender Press has reported on the Pellissippi extension, many people aren’t happy with the proposition of spending at least $100 million on a 4.5-mile stretch of highway, and people are uncomfortable with both the use of eminent domain to force them from their homes or seize portions of their property and the unavoidable and long-lasting environmental and cultural impact such a project would have on the rural areas of Blount County. The projected cost of the project has vacillated by millions of dollars.

East Lamar Alexander Parkway (U.S. 321) terminates in Townsend; along the way are turnoffs to many valuable pieces of real estate and immensely successful high-end hospitality venues, such as Blackberry Farm. Hellbender Press reached out to Blackberry Farm through its Nashville-based public relations team about the nearby highway project and was simply told “we have no comment.”

People who did not attend last night’s meeting have the opportunity to voice their opinion on the TDOT website.
 
The comment period is open through Oct. 12.
 
 
During Tuesday’s meeting, local bureaucrats and business interests indicated their support for the roadway, which biologists have warned could have adverse effects on the biologically diverse Little River . In addition to hosting a host of diverse aquatic animals , the river is the main source of raw drinking water for Blount County.

“City leadership supports the Pellissippi Parkway extension and I believe it would be extremely short-sighted not to complete this project that was started many years ago,” said Maryville City Manager Greg McClain. “As city leaders, we have an obligation to plan for future needs while we manage the present constraints. The extension will have a significant impact on reducing traffic congestion now and for decades to come.”

“On three separate occasions over the years, Maryville’s City Council has supported the project by resolution. We are sympathetic to those who believe this not to be a positive move, but with an eye on the future of the community and constraints on current roadways, we believe it is a necessary project,” McClain said.

Most of the affected properties and environmental impacts will occur outside the city limits, of course. Blount County Commission requested the state transportation department hold an actual public meeting on the design phase of the project following a widely criticized virtual public input option offered in April.

And when Tuesday came, and citizens came together, they had a lot to say – and yell.

According to The Daily Times and Hellbender sources, the majority of attendees who spoke were opposed to the parkway extension, but that’s only a sampling of those in attendance.

Of the estimated 250 people in the auditorium, 31 asked questions or spoke during the public meeting. Only one speaker supported the project.

The transportation department’s Region 1 Director Steve Borden told the crowd, however, “There’s an equal number of people that are passionate about this project.” The audience responded with jeers, asking “who?,” and suggesting the Blount Partnership, basically the chamber of commerce of Blount County, was the real driving force behind the parkway extension push.

“Blaming us for a roadway — not sure I understand that,” Blount Partnership President and CEO Bryan Daniels, told Daily Times reporter Adam Crawford after the meeting. He added, however, that the Blount Partnership was on record supporting the parkway extension.

But speaking to McClain’s point that the project has been decades in the making, Nina Gregg, a board member of Citizens Against Pellissippi Parkway Extension, asked: "How can you help us imagine or prepare for a sustainable way of life for future generations instead of persisting with this outdated and short-sighted 20th century idea?," according to reporting from Crawford. Original plans for the project were developed in the car-happy suburban push of the 1970s.’

CAPPE has persistently argued that the project’s foundation of traffic metrics was outdated, and essentially based on a nearly 50-year-old planning process.

Opponents of the parkway did say Tuesday’s public hearing was much better than the virtual option provided earlier for design-phase comments.

CAPPE president Jay Clark offered this statement following the Sept. 21 meeting:

“This was definitely better than the virtual meeting, and this wouldn’t have happened without the County Commission. The TDOT guy said, ‘your public officials,’ not elected officials.

“The County Commission hasn’t voted up or down on this since 2011, and only two or three commissioners we have now were on the commission then. I think our county commissioners now are really concerned about unsustainable growth and not wanting to have to raise taxes to build new schools. I think our next steps are to encourage everyone to call their county commissioners and say they don’t want this.”

CAPPE offered a follow-up statement Sept. 22, the day after the meeting: 

“At last night’s meeting, the questions from the public and TDOT staff’s boilerplate responses made clear to everyone the familiar conflict between the rigidity of our institutions and the necessity of being able to adapt to real world conditions.

“We hear a lot about ‘nimble’ organizations, when in practice most organizations are inflexible and stuck in procedures from decades ago. 

“To be fair, the issue is more than that they won’t adapt; in many cases they cannot adapt,” according to the statement.

“The establishing statutes, procedures and vested interests won’t allow them to act differently, and conventional training of managers is not to be flexible but rather to control.

“In this instance, the Pellissippi Parkway Extension is a 50-year-old idea aligned with a 20th-century paradigm of community planning based on the assumption that more roads are the solution to congestion and that high-speed roads are necessary for economic growth.  

“Opposition to the PPE is not new, but what is new is the related growing alarm here about how and where development is occurring in our community and reasonable questions about how we will pay for public services and how we will maintain the quality of life that makes Blount County distinctive,” CAPPE said in its statement the day after the meeting, a meeting that left people both frustrated and fired up.

Rate this item
(1 Vote)
Last modified on Thursday, 16 June 2022 23:41