The Environmental Journal of Southern Appalachia
Friday, 05 November 2021 15:49

University of Tennessee climate panel: Scientists say don’t despair. Yet.

Written by

bwhi1apicaaamlo.jpg large

Scientists discuss climate challenges and solutions during 2021 One Health Day

As climate experts and scientists huddled in Glasgow in an international effort to stem potentially disastrous global environmental changes, a panel of doctors representing multiple disciplines at the University of Tennessee and beyond offered their assessments of climate challenges and solutions.

Their take on climate change? We have problems, but we also have solutions. Hopelessness will drive you crazy. Stay healthy, stay informed and do your part to mitigate the long-term environmental consequences of a changing Earth. 

Above all: Don’t despair and don’t lose hope.

The panel, held Nov. 3 at the UT Student Union and presented by the UT One Health Initiative, consisted of the following experts:

— Dr. Gus Engman, Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture 

— Dr. Kate Evans, Computational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory

— Dr. Joshua Fu, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennesse

— Dr. Sindhu Jagadamma, Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture

— Dr. Kristina Kintziger, Department of Public Health, University of Tennessee

Answers have been edited for clarity and brevity and don’t include the full response. Questions were submitted ahead of time or during the panel discussion. 

What do you see as the largest threats of climate change, especially related to your individual research interests?

Engman: Changing precipitation patterns are something I think about a lot.

Pretty much all the rivers in the world are expected to have changes to their flow regime.

These changes in droughts and floods are a really large issue.

I think a lot about aquatic communities. If we are scarce on drinking water, we are always going to prioritize people having that water, over the fish or the bugs in the streams. 

There are all kinds of impacts to life histories and interactions with communities in streams. 

When animals are stressed because of these changes in precipitation patterns and changes in flow patterns, they might become more susceptible to other stressors, like disease. 

Changes in algal community composition can impact the entire water quality of a stream, and that might happen because of these changes in precipitation patterns.

These places that are experiencing these extreme droughts really worry me. The Colorado River already doesn’t even flow all the way to the ocean anymore. That’s a huge change. Because we take up so much water for agriculture. 

If a stream runs out of water, it’s not a stream anymore.

Evans: From a meteorological perspective, the biggest event that hurts people's health is actually heat waves. A lot of press goes to tornadoes and hurricanes and storms but in fact these large domes of hot air (are deadly), which happen because of changes in the large-scale weather patterns.

The greenhouse effect insulates the earth, it makes it more uniform in temperature and so that changes the flow patterns that go around the earth. That changes those big weather systems that come in and how long they stick around. 

When you talk about these long droughts, we know that’s what's we have to understand: Will they last longer, be more humid, less humid, and that has huge impacts for human health as well as the food they eat and the plants that grow. 

Kintziger: Heat also has a bigger impact on a more indirect pathway to human health. Not just heat-related illness but also cardiovascular impacts, renal impacts and even mental health impacts.

Heat is the one that keeps me up at night. We are seeing increasing temperatures globally and we also have this urban heat island affect. 

Our vulnerable populations in the cities — inner cities with lower-income housing, homeless populations — they are going to experience heat very differently than people who live in newer buildings with better cooling and infrastructure and have better capabilities for adapting to heat. 

Fu: Heat islands, especially for low-income people, who cannot pay their energy bills.

This year we had a heat wave in Europe. Last year, too. We can have more frequent heat waves. Those cause problems. 

We just published one paper this year, (projected) to 2050, middle of century, how climate change impacts urban areas (and provision of affordable utilities).

These problems will gradually spread to different communities no matter your income levels.

Jagadamma: As a soil scientist I am actually worried about the impact of climate change on agricultural sectors, globally and locally.

The increase in mean annual temperatures, and also the occurrence of more frequent and severe extreme events like drought and flood, can decrease crop production and also livestock production. 

Statistics show 64 percent of the world population depends on agriculture for a living. This negative impact can directly affect the 64 percent of population. It can also hit the other 40 percent in terms of shortage of high-quality food and an increase in food prices. 

What are the mitigation strategies that exist to prevent or slow the problems you are observing?

Jagadamma: I want to emphasize what we can do to keep (2.5 trillion) tons of carbon in the soil. 

In the past there was a lot of soil mismanagement — intensive tillage, over-application of fertilizers and other chemicals. These practices actually caused a lot of soil degradation. Because of that there were a lot of greenhouse gas emissions (that) enhanced the climate-change problems.

We can focus on soil-centric approaches to find solutions to these problems. These are natural approaches, include no tillage or reduced tillage or growing cover crops during fallow seasons.

We can also rotate several crops instead of growing one crop every year.

Another option is to replace (some) chemical fertilizers with organic sources. We can also integrate crop and livestock farming together. With all these practices we can definitely reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Kintziger: In public health we deal more with adaptation than mitigation: How can we reduce our vulnerabilities or increase our resilience?

At the larger scale, one thing public health can do, and is doing, is focus on improving our information systems and early warning systems around climate change impacts on human health.

We are working with hospital administration datasets to understand those types of health outcomes.

We are working more closely with environmental information systems to start integrating (relevant data) into one network. We also have public-health practitioners working with National Weather Service offices to better understand what the local area thresholds are for health impacts from heat and extreme temperatures.

Engman: We as humans could be so much more efficient with our water use. Our default storage for water is an open reservoir where there’s all this evaporation. (And) we are flushing it down our toilets, literally.

Sometimes we need to not think about mitigating or resisting these changes that are happening with climate change because they are going to happen and there’s not much we can do about it to some extent.

We can facilitate some of these changes in ways we think are best for biodiversity of ecosystem function.

Evans: I’m personally of the strategy we should develop technologies as soon as possible to take carbon out of the atmosphere.

I think removing some of that might be our best strategy to prevent some of the things we know are coming, at least from the atmosphere standpoint.

Fu: We are warming because of carbon dioxide emissions hanging there; 400 ppm carbon dioxide concentrations.

How to slow down climate change? Carbon recycling, recovery and reuse. 

All the countries that have forests, don’t touch it, don’t minimize forests in their own countries.

We need to work on the parallels that are working at the same time. 

Some predictions… If we still keep using fossil fuels we are going to 800 ppm of carbon dioxide concentration. Even 1,000.

What can individuals do to mitigate the effects of climate change? What strategies would you use to inspire individuals to take action around climate change?

(Long pause)

Jagadamma: We can do something maybe as environmental activists, to varying degrees, to address these environmental concerns. 

Engman: Individual solutions are great. But people need to start looking a little bigger. Don’t know if through voting or petitions but we need to demand of leaders broader change.

There’s a lot of changes that could’ve been happening, there are lots of people resistant to those changes happening; find a way to push back against those.

You can spend a lot of time focusing on what you are doing as an individual, but you can actually put that energy into pushing for broader changes.

Evans: One thing you can do is make sure your educational system is teaching everybody. Climate change is something we can understand, and it’s not trivial. Explain both the issues and solutions. People don’t just want to hear the earth is going to destroy itself, (they want to hear) there’s a way to fix it. I think that’s the key.

Kintziger: Some things we can do as individuals is just improve our overall health because it’s our underlying conditions that sometimes make us more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. 

Improving our social networks to increase our mental health resiliency can also benefit us after the effects of climate-related disaster. The mental health impacts are pretty profound. Having a social network, a social support system, can be very helpful as well.

Fu: The United Nations has sustainable development goals; they have very good guidelines. 

The University of Tennessee is now utilizing that and promoting it to our students. 

I have a presentation in high schools, and students are very interested in how they can protect the environment. 

Then they can tell their parents, 'you need to do that.' This is one strategy, to go to these younger people, to start.

We need to (reach) those young kids, when they grow up they carry the mindset.

These are cultural things. It’s not a one-day or overnight solution. But I believe we will get there.

Do you feel largely or hopeless about adapting to climate change? How would you help people who feel helpless?

Fu: I still have high hopes. 

As a nation, (U.S.) CO2 emissions are going down. Slowly,but the trend is going down. 

That means a lot of industries want to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in their manufacturing process. 

I still have high hope we will gradually get there.

Jagadamma: We have more scientific knowledge now than before about the seriousness of the problem. We also have potential solutions and support for actions.

We have soil-centric or climate-smart options available. Most of our farming communities are adopting one or both.

Globally, if producers adopt these better solid management practices they can mitigate 8 million tons of carbon a year.

Stay hopeful, and be informed about the knowledge we are gathering and also do what you can to educate the people around to the extent possible, and try to reduce the carbon footprint, like carpooling or things like that.

Kintziger: Our leaders need to be focused on this change, to modify our instrastructure. Seems that pendulum swings every couple of years.

I’m feeling a little less hopeful right now because of the general public’s pushback against science through this pandemic.

Even though our science is improving, I don’t know if they are listening, in general.

I do feel our younger generation are more prone to activism, and with respect to climate change that seems to be a big focus, that does give me hope. So I don’t want to end on a negative note.

Engman: I consider myself an optimist generally. I study ecosystems and animal communities…they are surprisingly resilient. Life finds a way. 

The worst thing you can think is there’s no value left anymore because it’s a little different.

Hopefully we can maintain some of the things we have but even if things are a little different in the future they are going to be very valuable to us. 

Ecosystems are still going to function and exist.

I think start petitions, write your senator or representative or (support) a lawsuit, whatever you need to do. I think we need to push our leaders to stand up on these sort of things.

 Climate Panel


Rate this item
(1 Vote)
Published in News, Event Archive

Related items

  • Appalachian trout in trouble as temps rise, storms rage
    in News

    trout_bradley.jpg.webpMichael Bradley, a fly-fishing guide, on Raven Fork in the Oconaluftee area of the Great Smoky Mountains.  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

    Climate change could steal your fish

    Dan Chapman is a public affairs specialist for the Southeast Region of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

    CHEROKEE — The mountains of the Southern Appalachians were scraped clean a century ago. Headwater ecology changed as the canopy of trees disappeared that was shading the streams from all but the noonday sun. Rainstorms pushed dirt and rocks into the water muddying the feeding and breeding grounds of fish, amphibians and insects. 

    Lower down the mountain, newly cut pastures edged right up to the creeks while cows mucked up the once-pristine waters. Invasive bugs killed hemlocks, ash and other shade-giving trees. Pipes, culverts and dams blockaded streams and kept animals from cooler water. 

    The trout never had a chance.

    Now they face an even more insidious foe — climate change. 

  • Green floater mussels are somewhat safe here but not elsewhere
    in News

    Green floater mussel Ryan Hagerty USFW A green floater mussel (Lasmigona subviridis).  Ryan Hagerty/USFWS

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The green floater, a freshwater mussel native to the waters of Southern Appalachia, is now formally considered at risk of extinction due to the loss and fragmentation of its aquatic habitat. 

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service determined the green floater, historically found in 10 eastern U.S. states, is likely to become endangered due to existing and emerging threats. The service is proposing to list the mussel as threatened under the Endangered Species Act

    The green floater is still found in its native range in North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia. It is considered locally extinct in Alabama and Georgia. 

    While the species has strongholds in places, green floaters are rare in nearly 80 percent of the watersheds where they naturally occur. More than 75 percent of the nation’s native freshwater mussel species are endangered or threatened, considered to be of special conservation concern, or presumed extinct, according to USWFS.

  • Here’s an updated summer primer for the end of the world as we know it
    in News

    halloween sun 2014 2kThe Earth’s sun is seen in this NASA image. Scientists said July might be the hottest month in 100,000 years.  

    The global heat wave of July 2023 has spared Southern Appalachia. So far.

    KNOXVILLE July 2023 has so far offered a scary look at global climate change around the world, and the month is already one for the record books.

    This month will likely end up being the hottest July on record, globally speaking. That comes after quantitative conclusions from multiple scientists that the past week was, globally, the warmest in 100,000 years.

    The Southern Appalachians have generally been spared from the heat settling on vast portions of the country and world, but that will soon change. The National Weather Service predicts higher than average temperatures flirting with 100 degrees in the Tennessee Valley next week. Record-breaking temperatures are possible. The average high temperature for July in Knoxville is 87 degrees.

  • To critics’ dismay, TVA plans to replace coal with natural gas. The utility also plans to double its solar supply.
    in News


    Citizens call on TVA to stop passing gas

    KNOXVILLE — The Tennessee Valley Authority in coming years plans to add both natural gas and solar plants to its portfolio to meet what it says are rising energy demands.

    TVA’s Board of Directors laid out the federal utility’s plan in a meeting at Norris Middle School in May. Environmentalists at a previous hearing criticized the utility’s focus on natural gas rather than renewables or other measures. Other people, largely tied to local power providers, argued that a switch to renewable energy would be unreliable.

    TVA showed a map in a press release following the meeting, showing four proposed natural gas plants and two proposed solar plants. Two of those natural gas plants would be in Tennessee while the other two are planned for Alabama and Kentucky. It stated these new plants will total 3,800 megawatts. It also spoke of its System Operations Center, set to open in fall 2024 in Georgetown to manage the utility’s grid. TVA also stated a desire to research nuclear technologies.

    “Our region is experiencing growth at six times the national average, which means we must invest in our current power system and build new generation so we can continue meeting our region’s demand,” said TVA president and CEO Jeff Lyash.

    Several citizens criticized TVA’s focus on natural gas plants and new pipelines at the listening session May 9. Among them was Clinton resident and activist John Todd Waterman.

  • Rocking chair rebellion: Older Americans help drive climate activism
    in News

    Third Act ROCKING CHAIRSPhoto courtesy of Third Act via The Revelator

    As their twilight approaches, elders supercharge climate action on behalf of future generations 

    This story was originally published by The Revelator. Eduardo Garcia is a New York-based climate journalist. A native of Spain, he has written about climate solutions for Thomson Reuters, The New York Times, Treehugger and Slate. He is the author of Things You Can Do: How to Fight Climate Change and Reduce Waste, an illustrated book about reducing personal carbon footprints.

    Thousands of senior Americans took to the streets in March in 30 states to demand that the country’s major banks divest from fossil fuels.

    This “rocking chair rebellion” — organized by Third Act, a fast-growing climate action group focused on older Americans — shows that Baby Boomers are becoming a new force in the climate movement.

    Third Act cofounder Bill McKibben, who joined a Washington, D.C., protest, says it’s unfair to put all the weight of climate activism on the shoulders of young people. It’s time for older Americans to take a central role.

    “Young people don’t have the structural power necessary to make changes,” McKibben tells The Revelator. “But old people do. There are 70 million Americans over the age of 60. Many of us vote, we’re politically engaged, and have a lot of financial resources. So if you want to press either the political system or the financial system, older people are a useful group to have.”

  • 8 billion people and counting in the face of climate change
    in News

    Canopy Nexus Hotel after floodingFlooding is seen outside a popular hotel in Pakistan following historic and devastating flooding linked largely to the melting of highland glaciers.  Wikipedia Commons

    Global population growth promises a drastic spike in public health emergencies

    This story was originally published by The Conversation. Maureen Lichtveld is dean of the School of Public Health at the University of Pittsburgh. 

    There are questions that worry me profoundly as an environmental health and population scientist.

    Will we have enough food for a growing global population? How will we take care of more people in the next pandemic? What will heat do to millions with hypertension? Will countries wage water wars because of increasing droughts?

    These risks all have three things in common: health, climate change and a growing population that the United Nations determined passed 8 billion people in November 2022, which is double the population of just 48 years ago.

  • UT prof: Dung beetle mothers protect their offspring from a warming world by digging deeper
    in News

    Research from Kimberly Sheldon at the University of Tennessee suggests insect behavior is adjusting for climate change

    The ConversationIf the TV series “Dirty Jobs” covered animals as well as humans, it would probably start with dung beetles. These hardworking critters are among the insect world’s most important recyclers. They eat and bury manure from many other species, recycling nutrients and improving soil as they go.

    Dung beetles are found on every continent except Antarctica, in forests, grasslands, prairies and deserts. And now, like many other species, they are coping with the effects of climate change.

    I am an ecologist who has spent nearly 20 years studying dung beetles. My research spans tropical and temperate ecosystems, and focuses on how these beneficial animals respond to temperature changes.

  • 5 big threats to the world’s rivers
    in News

    fresh water Conservation FisheriesA biologist with Conservation Fisheries surveys a stretch of Little River near Walland, Tennessee to determine fish viability and identify rare species for transplantation. Thomas Fraser/Hellbender Press

    Human activities have imperiled our waterways — along with a third of freshwater fish and other aquatic species

    This story was originally published by The Revelator.

    If we needed more motivation to save our ailing rivers, it could come with the findings of a recent study that determined the biodiversity crisis is most acute in freshwater ecosystems, which thread the Southern landscape like crucial veins and arteries.

    Rivers, lakes and inland wetlands cover 1 percent of the Earth but provide homes for 10 percent of all its species, including one-third of all vertebrates. And many of those species are imperiled — some 27 percent of the nearly 30,000 freshwater species so far assessed by the IUCN Red List. This includes nearly one-third of all freshwater fish.

    How did things get so bad? For some species it’s a single action — like building a dam. But for most, it’s a confluence of factors — an accumulation of harm — that builds for years or decades.

  • Austria to sue the European Union if it labels nuclear and gas power plants as “green infrastructure”

    VIENNA — Leonore Gewessler, Austria’s energy and climate minister announced that she would take the case to the European Court of Justice if the union’s executive proceeds with plans to include nuclear and natural gas in the EU taxonomy of sustainable finance.

    About gas, Gewessler said that it releases unconscionable amounts of greenhouse gases. “Just because something is less bad than coal doesn’t make it good or sustainable.”

    Regarding nuclear energy she said it has unpredictably high risks, referring to Chernobyl and Fukushima. She also mentioned as great concerns, the safe disposal of spent nuclear fuel and lack of a global solution for its final storage.

  • Brutal Hurricane Ian was just one of budding global weather emergencies at the time
    in News

    overflight storm ianCatastrophic damage to the Sanibel Island Causeway is shown in this NOAA overflight after Hurricane Ian absolutely demolished most of Fort Myers Beach, Florida.

    Evidence mounts that climate change is creating monster storms as death toll climbs in Ian’s wake

    This story was originally published by The Conversation.

    FORT MYERS BEACH — When Hurricane Ian hit Florida and killed at least 100 people, it was one of the United States’s most powerful hurricanes on record, and it followed a two-week string of massive, devastating storms around the world.

    A few days earlier in the Philippines, Typhoon Noru gave new meaning to rapid intensification when it blew up from a tropical storm with 50 mph winds to a Category 5 monster with 155 mph winds the next day. Hurricane Fiona flooded Puerto Rico, then became Canada’s most intense storm on record. Typhoon Merbok gained strength over a warm Pacific Ocean and tore up over 1,000 miles of the Alaska coast.